<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rwfesq.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Audit Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS Problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like there is a downside to being wealthy: tax audits.  The more you make, the more likely it is that you are going to be subject to and IRS audit.  The reality is, though, that for most of &#8230; <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280">IRS Audit Rates</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is a downside to being wealthy: tax audits.  The more you make, the more likely it is that you are going to be subject to and IRS audit.  The reality is, though, that for most of us, the audit rate is very, very low.  According to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/03/23/pf/taxes/tax_audits_millionaires/index.htm" target="_blank">CNN Money</a>, the wealthiest taxpayers have about a 1-in-3 chance of being audited whereas taxpayers who earn between $25,000 to $200,000 have 1% or less of a chance of an audit.</p>
<p>Be careful if you are notified of an audit.  I have been dealing with a number of cases lately where the taxpayer is forced to spend time and money to appeal or otherwise challenge an audit that could have been avoided with better audit management.  Ultimately, you can get the IRS to make the correct decision but you can also spend some money to get them to that point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=280">IRS Audit Rates</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=280</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Estate Tax Update</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad to finally hear rumors that the federal estate tax will be dealt with this year by Congress.  Back in 2001, Congress passed a law that increased the federal estate tax exemption from $1 million per person up &#8230; <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277">Federal Estate Tax Update</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.advisorone.com/2012/02/01/estate-tax-limbo-likely-to-end-this-year" target="_blank">I am glad to finally hear rumors that the federal estate tax will be dealt with this year by Congress</a>.  Back in 2001, Congress passed a law that increased the federal estate tax exemption from $1 million per person up to $3.5 million per person by 2009 and then ended the estate tax for 2010.  The problem was that the law reverted back to the 2001 status after 2010.</p>
<p>The bizarre result was that there was no federal estate tax in 2010 (good news for George Steinbrenner&#8217;s family as well as the families of a few other billionaires) while Congressed ignored the problem.  Then, right before it looked like we were going to go back to a $1 million exemption for 2011, Congress did what they are so good at doing: they put in a two-year fix and kicked the can to 2012, a presidential election year.</p>
<p>Now, it seems like they are going to be forced to deal with the estate tax when they take up the issue of the Bush tax cuts.  Assuming no unexpected change in the make-up of Congress, the prognosticators are saying that we are going to keep the $5 million exemption for at least another year and, likely, for the long-term.  Let&#8217;s hope it happens because it will make estate planning much more predictable for most people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=277">Federal Estate Tax Update</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=277</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Importance of Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durable power of attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incapacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last will and testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning for the possibility of incapacity and the certainty of passing away is an uncomfortable topic for most people.  However, failure to plan for these events can sometimes lead to unintended financial outcomes, family tension and many other negative and sometimes heartbreaking consequences.  While the strategies may vary, estate planning is important for everyone no matter the size or complexity of the estate. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272">Importance of Planning</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planning for the possibility of incapacity and the certainty of passing away is an uncomfortable topic for most people.  However, failure to plan for these events can sometimes lead to unintended financial outcomes, family tension and many other negative and sometimes heartbreaking consequences.  While the strategies may vary, estate planning is important for everyone no matter the size or complexity of the estate.</p>
<p>All effective estate plans should include, at minimum, three important documents:</p>
<ul>
<li>A <em>Durable Power of Attorney</em> allows a trusted person to manage your property and make decisions on your behalf during your life and in case you are ever unable to take care of yourself.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Healthcare Directive</em> is your opportunity to record your wishes for continuing or removing life sustaining treatment if you are ever suffering from a terminal and non-recoverable condition.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Finally, a <em>Last Will and Testament</em> allows for the management and distribution of your property after death.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are many other tools available depending on the size and complexity of financial and family affairs.  For example, many Americans also are using revocable (or &#8220;living&#8221;) trusts to avoid probate and to manage their estates both during their lives and after they have passed.</p>
<p>Like any other important product or service, your choice in planning advisors should be made with care.  Find someone who will listen to you, make you feel comfortable about discussing and making these choices and who will help you to achieve your objectives.</p>
<p>I offer an initial consultation and preliminary analysis at no charge that allows potential clients the opportunity to make an informed choice about their legal service advisor and estate plan strategy before committing financial resources.  Each plan, like every person, is unique and I pride myself on offering a custom and personal solution for all clients.</p>
<p>I would be happy to discuss your plan with you; however, whether you choose to contact me or not, I strongly urge everyone to make a plan.  And, if you have a plan already, it should be reviewed at least every 3-5 years for changes in the law and in your situation and circumstances.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=272">Importance of Planning</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=272</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks and Powers of Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durable power of attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incapacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers of attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You cannot just look to the law for limitations on powers of attorney.  A power of attorney only works if the third party to whom it is presented is willing to accept it. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269">Banks and Powers of Attorney</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more frustrating aspects of estate planning is drafting powers of attorneys (also known as POAs) so that banks and other financial institutions will accept them.  The reason that it is frustrating is that banks often adopt policies which are designed to protect them from liability; however, in reality, these policies have the effect of invalidating an otherwise valid power of attorney and they do not always protect the financial institution from any risk.</p>
<p>A common example is the joint attorney-in-fact.  In order for this to make sense, a few definitions are in order.  A &#8220;Power of Attorney&#8221; is a document whereby the &#8220;Principal&#8221; appoints an &#8220;attorney-in-fact&#8221; to act in the place of the principal.  So, for example, if I were to execute a power of attorney and appoint my wife to make decisions for me, I would be the principal and she would be the attorney-in-fact.  (By the way, don&#8217;t let the terminology fool you; an &#8220;attorney-in-fact&#8221; need not actually be an attorney.)  Powers of attorney come in several flavors and I will discuss the differences in more detail in a later post.  For now, a &#8220;Durable Power of Attorney&#8221; is one that remains in effect after the principal becomes incapacitated whereas a power of attorney that is not durable terminates upon the principal&#8217;s incapacity.</p>
<p>Some principals choose to appoint more than one person to act as attorney-in-fact.  Multiple attorneys-in-fact can either be appointed to act independently (meaning that either attorney-in-fact can take all the power given in the power of attorney) or jointly (meaning that all the attorneys-in-fact must agree before any action can be taken).  Many clients think that appointing, for example, their children as joint attorneys-in-fact will require them to work together and avoid disputes.  However, setting aside the issue of disputes among children for a moment, the bigger problem will be with the financial institution.</p>
<p>Many financial institutions, especially the large, national banks, refuse to accept powers of attorney with joint attorneys-in-fact.  I recently dealt with one such institution that was not able to articular the particular risk that they were concerned with but it likely had something to do with the fact that they are not set up to require two signatures on checks and other instructions.  Remember, that in order for joint attorneys-in-fact to take action, they must act together and if a bank does not have a system to require two signatures on a check, the bank cannot police itself.</p>
<p>A power of attorney is only good if the third party to whom it is presented is willing to accept it.  If the third party accepts it and it later turns out to be invalid, the third party can be liable for losses.  In Washington, we have a safe harbor rule as well as a process to force a financial institution to accept a power of attorney.  I will post articles on these topics later.</p>
<p>The moral of the story, however, is that you cannot just look to the law for limitations on powers of attorney.  A power of attorney with a joint attorney-in-fact is perfectly legal in Washington but a bank may not be willing to accept it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=269">Banks and Powers of Attorney</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=269</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Continuity Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business continuity planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorist attacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All businesses (and individuals as well) should at least be thinking about business continuity and disaster recovery issues.  It is always better to confront these kinds of problems before they become real rather than to figure it out after the fact. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265">Business Continuity Planning</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine <a href="http://www.safeharborconsulting.biz/" target="_blank">runs a consulting company, called Safe Harbor Consulting, which is focused on business continuity planning</a>.  While many large companies, with significant resources, can afford to plan for disasters and other disruptions in their businesses, many small companies completely ignore this important task.</p>
<p>Business continuity planning refers to the establishment and documentation of business systems designed to keep the business running and meeting the needs of its customers in response to some kind of event.  These events, usually unexpected, can range from natural disasters to terrorist attacks and even regular power outages.  What is your plan if any of these kinds of events were to affect your business?</p>
<p>Even if you operate a small business and do not have substantial, or even minimal, resources you should still at least be thinking about these issues (both for your business and your personal matters).  If nothing else, take a few minutes to read <a href="http://safeharborconsulting.biz/blog2/" target="_blank">Safe Harbor&#8217;s very interesting blog posts on these topics</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=265">Business Continuity Planning</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuation Discounts</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift tax exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift tax exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Washington case supported a taxpayer's use of valuation discounts for LLC units as well as a redirection of excess gifts to a charity. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259">Valuation Discounts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904491704576570980775431732.html#printMode" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal recently reported</a>, a Washington State case recently upheld a taxpayer&#8217;s right not only to take a valuation reduction for LLC units but also to redirect gifts which unintentionally exceed the gift tax exemption to a charity.</p>
<p>Discounts are a common technique for making gifts.  The idea is that if you place property into an LLC and then distribute ownership units in that LLC, each unit will have a lower value than the whole because no one collection of units controls the LLC.  These minority interests are often discounted substantially.  In the case described in the article, the estate took at 51% discount but settled later with the IRS for a lower discount.</p>
<p>Valuations are common and generally accepted (although subject to constant attack by the IRS).  The issue in the case really involved the feature of the plan that automatically gifted to a charity any amount in excess of the $1 million gift tax exemption.  The IRS wanted, instead, to collect more gift tax but the court found in favor of the taxpayer.</p>
<p>The IRS can change its regulations, however, so this win might be short-lived.  If you have a large estate or significant assets that you would like to gift while alive, please call for a free consultation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=259">Valuation Discounts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=259</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money Issues of Surviving Spouses</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death of a spouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article in the Wall Street Journal highlights the importance of planning for the death of a spouse.  No matter how uncomfortable it might be, planning ahead is more than worth the cost. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247">Money Issues of Surviving Spouses</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Lauricella of the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903927204576577170670302708.html?KEYWORDS=surviving+spouses" target="_blank">wrote an interesting article about the money issues that confront a surviving spouse after the death of a spouse</a>.  The article provides a good summary of the logistical, legal and financial issues and the benefits of planning ahead.</p>
<p>Too many people, for whatever reason, do not plan ahead.  Whether it is the cost or the uncomfortable conversations that must take place, those issues pale in comparison to the responsibilities of a surviving spouse (at the worst possible time). Most of my clients express relief when they are done with their planning process so, despite the uncomfortable conversation, the end result is a stress reliever.  The cost, in most cases, is quite reasonable.</p>
<p>When compared to the sad and stressful days following the death of a spouse, the planning process is relatively easy and inexpensive!</p>
<p>If you are considering a <a title="Estate Planning" href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=61">will, trust or other documents</a>, please call for an appointment.  Consultations are always free!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=247">Money Issues of Surviving Spouses</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=247</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Statute of Limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS Problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent spouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installment agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal revenue code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IRS has only 10 years to collect a tax debt.  The 10 years is counted from the date of the assessment (not the tax year) and the statute is extended if a taxpayer pursues any number of strategies. <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250">IRS Statute of Limitations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IRS has a <strong>statute of limitations</strong> on collections.  Internal Revenue Code Section 6502 places a limit on the amount of time that the IRS can collect a tax debt.  The timeframe is ten years <strong>from the date of the assessment.</strong>  The date of the assessment is the date that the tax debt is entered into the IRS computer system.  So, just because you have not filed for 2002 does not mean that your problem goes away in 2012.  Once you file a return and it is processed, the IRS enters the assessment into the system and that is when the statute begins to run.</p>
<p>There are a number of tools that we use to manage an IRS tax debt and many of those tools result in the tolling (or suspension) of the statute of limitations.  For example, the statute is tolled in each of the following cases:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Offer in Compromise" href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=37">Offers in Compromise</a></li>
<li>Collection Due Process Appeal</li>
<li>Bankruptcy</li>
<li><a title="Installment Agreements" href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=22">Installment Agreements</a></li>
<li>Voluntary Waivers</li>
<li>Lawsuits filed by the IRS</li>
<li>Foreign Travel for Six Months</li>
<li><a title="Innocent Spouse Relief" href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=57">Innocent Spouse</a> and Taxpayer Assistance</li>
</ul>
<p>If you do not know when your statute expires, the IRS calculates the date which is available as part of your account.  You can call the IRS or order a transcript to find out.</p>
<p>If you need help <a title="IRS Tax Problems" href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=32">managing your IRS debt</a>, please call anytime.  We are here to help and consultations are always free.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=250">IRS Statute of Limitations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=250</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employees in Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment security department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommuting employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state department of labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you considering hiring employees in Washington State?  Whether you are a business located in Washington or an out-of-state business considering hiring one or more employees here, you must be aware of the states requirements for hiring employees.   <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234">Employees in Washington</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you considering hiring employees in Washington State?  Whether you are a business located in Washington or an out-of-state business considering hiring one or more employees here, you must be aware of the states requirements for hiring employees.  Even if your business is not located in Washington and is not doing any business here, if you have a telecommuting employee who performs work here, you have certain responsibilities.  And, be careful, we have an economic nexus rule in Washington which could result in Business &amp; Occupations (B&amp;O) Tax.</p>
<p><strong>Industrial Insurance (Department of Labor &amp; Industries)<br />
</strong>Generally, employees of one or more employees must provide industrial insurance coverage.  There are some employees and owners who are exempt; however, unless there are available exemptions, a business either must purchase insurance from the Department of Labor &amp; Industries or, if the business has at least $25 million in assets, self-insure.  The rules that govern industrial insurance can be complicated and the penalties for non-compliance are significant.  <a href="http://www.lni.wa.gov/main/ForBusiness.asp" target="_blank">Please follow this link to the business information available for the Washington State Department of Labor &amp; Industries</a>.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Unemployment Benefits (Employment Security Department)</strong><br />
Every business with employees in Washington state must register with the Employment Security Department and file unemployment insurance taxes every quarter.</p>
<p><strong>Business and Occupations Tax and Sales Tax (Department of Revenue)</strong><br />
The B&amp;O Tax is a tax on gross receipts for the benefit of doing business in the State of Washington. We have no income tax in Washington, so the primary revenue source for the state is the sales tax and the B&amp;O Tax on businesses. The B&amp;O Tax is assessed against gross revenue. Generally, this means that the tax is assessed against all invoices regardless of what is actually collected (although there is a credit for bad debt) and regardless of profitability (i.e., expenses do not matter).  The B&amp;O Tax can result in some unusual situations (for example, <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=204" target="_blank">see my blog posting about staffing companies here</a>).  Washington has an &#8220;economic nexus&#8221; law which means that you do not need to have a physical location in Washington or employees here in order to be considered to be doing business in Washington.  A business only needs to be conducting activities up to certain dollar limits (<a href="http://dor.wa.gov/content/findtaxesandrates/bandotax/economicnexus.aspx" target="_blank">you can read about economic nexus here</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Registering Your Business in Washington</strong><br />
New businesses and existing businesses that expand to include employees that are subject to unemployment insurance must complete a <a href="http://bls.dor.wa.gov/file.aspx" target="_blank">Washington state business license application</a>.  This will establish an account with the departments of Labor &amp; Industries, Revenue and Employment Security.</p>
<p>If you are a business here in Washington or considering coming to Washington, please feel free to contact me if you need assistance setting up your business here.  I offer a wide range of <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=78">business law services</a> as well as assistance with the <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=118">Department of Revenue</a> or <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?page_id=32">Internal Revenue Service</a> for businesses and individuals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=234">Employees in Washington</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=234</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph_Flick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many Americans, I spent my day today enjoying my freedom.  There is little more I can add to the discussion other than to say &#8220;Thank You&#8221; to the first responders and the members of our armed forces who make &#8230; <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225">Remembering 9/11</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I spent my day today enjoying my freedom.  There is little more I can add to the discussion other than to say &#8220;Thank You&#8221; to the first responders and the members of our armed forces who make days like today possible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rwfesq.com/?p=225">Remembering 9/11</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.rwfesq.com">The Law Offices of Ralph W. Flick, P.S.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwfesq.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=225</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

